All posts by suzanne

Collective Amnesia in the Immigration Debate (2)

Our victory in the Mexican American War added a huge amount of land to the U.S. and introduced issues of property rights and confiscation. This produced some of the consequences we see in our Southwest today. The Irish immigration following the potato famine led to longstanding issues in our immigration policies. Immigration also became a major factor leading to the Civil War.

Unlikely Bedfellows in Syria


Syria, like other Middle East nations, is an artificial state. It’s made up of a multiplicity of ethnic groups with little in common and a Sunni majority ruled by Alawite Shias. This potent mix is vastly complicated by the arrival of Russian tanks, artillery, and troops. The danger of accidental collision should not be ignored. The Turks, who control the water supply, have their impact. So do the Sunni Kurds and the Jordanians, who are extremely anti-Isis. Oddly, Iran, Hezbollah, and Israel are on the same side on this one–not working together, but sharing strategic objectives. What a mess!

Syrian Refugee Crisis Backstory (4): Civil War and Chaos

Civil war starting in 2011 creates a power vacuum in northern Syria that attracts Saddam’s former key strategists, who begin working with ISIS to regain Sunni power. As factions and nations take sides based on their own competing interests, Syria becomes fragmented. ISIS uses the power vacuum to pursue its goal of establishing a totalitarian Islamic caliphate. Chaos and fighting touches off the Syrian migration to Europe that we see today. Here’s a bit more detail.https://youtu.be/j7azThPm8WY

The Iran Deal

The purpose of my blog is to provide some historical context and/or comparison for what may be in the news recently while staying away from partisan politics. That’s pretty hard to do in the current political climate.

I’ve been reading a lot about the Iran deal. So much to say! Let’s start with the background to Iran’s nuclear buildup.  It appears that the Iranian regime got serious about developing a nuclear program out of fear of the invasion of Iraq–that the U.S. meant what it said about imposing democracy in Iraq as a model for the other authoritarian regimes in the Middle East.

The historical roots go deeper than that. When the U.S. and its allies removed Saddam from Iraq, President Bush encouraged the Shia and Kurds to revolt. They did and Pres. Bush had second thoughts about helping them since it could dismantle Iraq.

So, Saddam could proceed to decimate the Kurds and the Shia. The U.S. and others acted with no fly zones to aid the Kurds successfully, but stood by while Saddam eviscerated the Shia and proceeded to drain their water lands turning it into a desert.

Those Shia who could get out went to the only place offering refuge–Iran. Iran took good care of them. Not surprisingly this encouraged the Sia refugees to be receptive to seeing the U.S. As the Great Satan.

When the U.S. Invades again and decides to hold free elections, it was a given that a Shia coalition would win. Who might they look to for support?

Food for thought.

 

What If We Attack Iran?

I wish people who make foreign policy recommendations without having the responsibility of carrying them out would think through the what if’s and weigh the intended and unintended consequences. Someone asked, “What would happen if we attack Iran?” Here’s my 3-minute speculation. (recorded June 14, 2015 in the car on the Ohio Turnpike)  

Why We Have to Control the Persian Gulf

As we drove the Ohio Turnpike near Cleveland on Sunday, June 13, I thought about Oliver Hazard Perry’s naval victory in Lake Erie and how that connects to the necessity of controlling the Persian Gulf. Here’s the 3-minute summary Suzanne recorded while I drove.